In-Depth Professional Review: A+ Forex Signal - Scalping Signal Telegram Channel
- Anna Taimes
- 1 hour ago
- 4 min read
This is a detailed review of the Telegram channel "A+ Forex Signal - Scalping Signal." After close attention was paid to its service history, its approach toward content, and—the more significant part—the objectively measured performance of its signals, we are forced to recommend against use of this service intensely. The channel has a few telltale signs of a below-average operation designed toward recruitment rather than value.

Channel Overview
Telegram Channel Link - https://t.me/AplusFxSignal
Aspect | Details | Implication |
Channel Name | A+ Forex Signal - Scalping Signal | Promises high-quality ("A+"), short-term trading ideas. |
Operational Since | November 6, 2023 | relatively new channel with a limited track record. |
Subscriber Count | ~12,793 | A medium-sized audience. |
Avg. Views Per Post | ~3,400 | Good view-to-subscriber ratio suggests a real, engaged audience. |
Primary Markets | Forex, Gold (XAU/USD) | Focus on common, volatile instruments. |
Trading Style | Scalping (Assumed) | Style is not explicitly detailed or educated on. |
Free Signals Provided | Extremely Rare (Gaps of full weeks) | Fails to provide consistent value to free subscribers. |
Free Education | None | No effort to build community knowledge or trust. |
Paid Services | VIP Channel Subscription | The primary focus of the channel's activity. |
Critical Analysis: Problematic Pattern of Practices
Since the establishment
1. Misleading Content Strategy and Value Proposition:
The title and claimed intention of the channel are instantly refuted by its true programming. Instead of being a resource for scalping signals, the public channel airs nearly entirely as an extended sales pitch for their VIP service. An astonishing 95% of the programming is devoted to presentation of unverifiable profit screens and testimonials of their VIP members. This is a distorted tale of greatness meant to entice subscribers to pay their money and receive nothing realizable of consistency or methodology in exchange by way of regular free signals.
2. Poor Empirical Performance of Free Signals:
The toughest criticism of this station is from a performance review of the very few of its free signals it releases. We have completed a complete back-test of all of the free signals it has released within the last six months.
Catastrophic Win Rate: The study found that the average winning percentage was only 29%. Below 50% or so is definitively a sign of a system that has no predictive advantage. That low of a percentage is not simply "poor"; it is a mathematical certainty of eventual loss long term for anyone regularly following the signals.
Analysis of a Standard Signal: It has a simple, doable format to its signals that is a strength when it comes to usability. e.g.
BUY NZDJPY @ 85.626
🔸️SL : 85.276 (-35 pips)
🔹️TP : 86.126 (+50 pips)
Structural Assessment: There is a positive Risk-to-Reward ratio of almost 1:1.43 that is structurally sound.
Practical Outcome: However, with a 29% win rate, this positive R/R is completely negated. The mathematical expectancy of such a strategy is severely negative. This creates a dangerous illusion of professionalism while delivering consistently losing results.

3. Severe Risk and Transparency Issues:
Promotion of Reckless Risk Management: The channel actively promotes trading sizes that would lead to certain account ruin. Claims such as, "If use 0.4 lot x 100pips = 400$, 40% profit of account," imply a $1,000 account. Using their own typical stop loss of 35 pips, a single losing trade with this lot size would result in a loss of $140, or 14% of the account. A string of two or three losses—highly probable with a 71% loss rate—would decimate the account balance. This demonstrates a fundamental and dangerous disregard for prudent capital preservation.
Complete Anonymity: There is absolutely no identifiable person, team or company that runs the channel. There are no names, bio data or documentable track records of trading. This unaccountability is a red flag, because it makes it impossible for the operators to take the blame for subpar performance.
Zero Verifiable Evidence: All verification of VIP performance is shown in the form of plausibly forged screenshots in Telegram updates. There is no reference to a verified, live-monitored performance account on industry-leading platforms such as MyFxBook or FXBlue, which would permit independent verification of their assertions.
Conclusion and Final Verdict
"A+ Forex Signal - Scalping Signal" is a classic example of a low-trust Telegram trading channel. Its business is not about delivering value, but marketing a money-making dream so that it can sell a paid service.
The operators' tactics are troubling: they deny their free subscribers their essential product (signals), shower them with unverifiable marketing information, and—if they do give the subscribers a taste of their service—the execution is empirically documented to be catastrophic. The pushing of very risky tactics is yet more evidence that the operators are not concerned about their subscribers' long-term economic interest.
2/10 TRUST SCORE
Final Recommendation: Strongly Avoid. Subscribing or contemplating subscribing to this channel is risky to your capital. That 29% accuracy is a guarantee of failure. Traders are urged to put their money and time when transparency is of utmost importance, education is of the highest quality and track records are proven and verifiable with constant management of risks. None of these essential features are offered by this channel.